NOTE: As I mailed to KS, I would love to have some of these pics to put in my book.
In a few weeks my manuscript goes in and I will have to turn in actual pictures
(5" X 3" or 6" X 4" prints using high tech scanners - apparently that's better than using
pic negatives these days). Anyone that has a quality picture of a nice bright and/or
big fish with good river or water or mountain background scenery would be good candidates.
Just e-mail me if interested and I will e-mail you my regular address to send
re-prints to, along with your name. I would love to have the lower 2 of your 4 pics Bob.
All the fish are great but the excellant river background is important. >

I've also noticed in a number of pics how the angle can glare out the lateral line
and dark back contrast, which is nice to have. This happens mostly when a flash is used,
as below in this pic.
[img]http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=1432992&a=10739464&p=56038335&Sequence=2[/img]

In a pic from Tofino, B.C. this summer you'll notice with BB member Bruce Gray's 2 fish,
which were identically bright, that the one on the right that's squared to the cam
looks brighter than the other which isn't. Hey Bruce, I don't remember any women on board
taking pics, yet the tails were cut
off. (better talk to your bro about that) Of course with women taking the pics
the fishermen's heads are usually cut off.
[img]http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=1432992&a=10739464&p=56038350&Sequence=2http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=1432992&a=10739464&p=56038350&Sequence=2[/img]

Just kidding around ladies. It's a thing my wife used to do until she figured out the cam
takes a pic of what is seen thru the view finder.

[ 11-07-2001: Message edited by: RT i ]