OK Giz, here's how it is. It's a matter of nomenclature. You see, I said posting a "mistake" of mine. Here's the low down - those weren't mistakes! I misspelled them on purpose! Just for the funny irony. Get it? hahaha You know how silly and goofy I get. I did those on purpose, therefore they were not mistakes by me. You can't prove I typed some improperly spelled words by mistake. Therefore I am ... ah, let's see ... weaseling out of the 'mistake' of not realizing some would not see the obvious precedent set by the previous paragraph; and not realizing I never make any mistakes. And that it should be obvious to anyone that I spelled those words wrong on purpose, just to tease you.

I cite the legal precendent of Hampton vs Bonehead, U.S. District Court of Appeals, circa 1837 - To wit: Judge Hebe Hollerin declares that "A mistake is subjective to the degree of the intent of the mistakee. If there is intent to induce such said mistake, then by legal interpretation the intent removes the action of mistakism from the actual act. Furthermore, it is this court's opinion that if the actual act is in itself construed to be a mistake, then that is just too dam bad for the construer."

I rest my case. - RT