The parent post is about President Bush and his environmental record during the scant 14 months that he's been president, with some other politician/environment discussion thrown in. If you all wanna talk about whether George W. Bush IN GENERAL is fit to be in the White House then I can tap that dance too. I'll give ya so much information about this goofball that it'll make your head spin, and the best you'll be able to come back with is "Well Gore was this" or "Gore would do that" or "Nader something else" instead of admitting that this "President" is doing his best to sell us all down the river. Environmentally, politically, internationally, corporately (is that a word?), every way you can imagine and a few you cannot.

I'd like to pretend that the contributions that you classify as NFR do have some value (note that all posts in this thread were on topic), so don't spoil it for me. But what I'm also saying is that a full-out, no holds barred debate on the Thief in Chief would spiral horribly out of control until it earns a rarely-administered (but likely earned) lock by the mods.

Call it fair warning. I've done my homework.