SteelieDan

As an attorney, I think that you already know the correct answer. Look at what you already have said; "I guess I'd look at this way: if you had a house on the river, would you want people trespassing through your back yard to get to your honey hole?''

Well what if those same people paid for that same property that you are going to use to get to that "honey hole", or they had bought that "honey hole"?

It really doesn't matter what you or I would "want", does it? What difference is there if you had a house on the river, and you invited all of your friends to go fishing on your property? Do you really think that the person(s) who owns the property leading to your house can legally stop (or keep out) all of your friends from using that same road to go fishing on the property that you have easements rights too?

There's really no difference is there? People who own property at point "A" cannot legally stop people who have rights to visit the property of point "B", or using the property of "B" (unless there is clear restrictive writen language in the easement of such property, right?

Glad to see that you at lease have the guts to speak up! Most attorneys don't, unless, like you have said, pay up the $150+ bucks!

Cowlitzfisherman

Is the taste of the bait worth the sting of the hook????