I feel obligated to make a comment on the original subject of this thread but really don't know the details so am hesitant to do so. Yes, it seems unfair to provide state funds for a hatchery program (and the associated access road, parking lot, etc.) without allowing for it's intended use. Still, if you can't see the relationship between increased use and increased risk, you need to get into a remedial math class. Frankly it seems the fault lies with the state sinking money into it without getting a guarantee for access, but that's just my gut reaction without knowing any of the specific details.

LZZ, no matter how many people you've seen die from cancer (and I haven't seen one, but I HAVE lived with two people that have gone through chemo and radiation, one of them an accelerated program that nearly killed him, but in the end saved his life), it's not a meaningful excuse to wish it on someone else.

All you've done is give me (and obviously a number of other people) the impression that you value your own recreational time over human life. Either that, or you figure you can say whatever you want, since this is just the internet. I doubt you'd stand up in a public forum and say the same thing. Please tell me I'm right.