there is still nothing in the piece to conflate the two. that has been my point all along. there is nothing in the piece strong enough to overcome the huge bias by the publisher. you have to consider the source and this source only publishes far right neo-con perspectives

your iraq anaolgy is very appropriate, they would use a fact here and a fact there and act as if they are related when, in reality; there was nothing but cherry picked facts. then they went on acting like they are connecting the dots of a larger picture that wasnt there.

this is much of the same, nothing to connect the dots but some cherry picked facts that have nothing to do with eachother....

sorry but i really dont see holland throwing someone out for having strong opinions......the muslims that move to holland are required to watch a video on guys kissing and people smoking marijuana and topless women and all the kinds of situations that they will be subjected to that will be far from thier customs. they are not bending over to not offend the muslims..... not far away in denmark they even had some cartoons that caused some offense to muslims if you remember......muslims are europes mexican and they pay them about the same as we do mexicans.....it aint right but they are not all about not offending the muslims........they are all about having them clip the hedges and trim the lawn