By no means am I agreeing with the article or the "facts" by posting it here. I would say something to that effect if that were the case. I do find it very weird, for lack of a better word, how some feel that you need to prove something harms the environment before it stops where others feel you need to prove it doesn't harm the environment to allow it to continue. This has been going on since 1977, unless the press is lying. Is it harming the environment? The fact is nobody knows for sure. Should it stop? I don't know. Is it that necessary to be test firing these into the ocean? Maybe. Maybe not.