I would be willing to go without fishing for five years too. we should not debate wich is worse for too long. damns and nets are two major problems. I am interested if anyone knows any attorneys that have much fisheries knowledge? could we use the initiative process much like tim eyeman does to ban river nets ? or would that be federally overridden? Can treaty rights be honored but the methods of extraction changed? I have a feeling this approach has been tried before, does anyone have any info on previouse inititive attempts to regulate either nets or damns?