Sounds like someone bugged our conversations. We've talked about this numerous times, but I've never heard or read that it's actually being considered.
Any decent lawyer representing Indian Treaty Rights would never allow this to happen. A "lease", perhaps, but Treaty Rights cannot be sold, in part, due to future generations' denial of ancestral entitlement.
Think about it. It would be immoral.

On the other hand, I'd sure pay an extra $25 to be able to fish more often.
I would not pay $25 to catch more fish. How much can a person eat, anyway?
We're just bummed right now because the rivers are still too low and the ocean/Straits are closed. Seems like the only thing we can do for the time being, is ( my Gawd ) talk to each other.