I agree with Dan S and Parker. I fail to see how this reg will effect anyone other than those who do right anyways. What good will the reg do compared to other possible reg changes in this cycle? Zero, maybe a few fish? I see this as being motivated by a few dudes who don't like internet pictures. Petty and futile. If this rule is adopted at the expense of reg changes that have real impact on our fisheries, it will reflect the values of those that have propsed it. And potentially expose the organizations we trust as motivated by ego and small clique, and not real change. I agree that non-target fish should be released with care. Isn't that the law already?! This reg is specifically targeted at fishing pictures, it is petty and silly, and offers no value to our fisheries. To those who are spending energy on this reg, please focus on regs that will have a long term impact on our fisheries, like C&R water, selective reg waters, etc that have proven to work when applied in other states. I'm curious- has this proposed reg ever been tried anywhere, and how did it affect things? I just don't see the point. Meanwhile, my reg proposals were not included, regs that will benefit sportfishers, for absurd reasons. No wonder we sporties get screwed- we do it to ourselves. Jimminy christmas, wake up eh?!