CFM, there's not much I can add here, as this proposal and it's affects are frankly beyond me. I am however willing to help any way possible. It's just moral support for now, but when the time comes I'll chip in.

Perhaps a rough draft of an initiative posted here would induce some participation. It would at least inform the un-informed(me). It sure sounds like a simple solution for such a cluster@#$%. How did CA do it? Can we read thier initiative(if that's how it was done)?

The relationship between govt. and commercial fishig intrests should be and probably is illeagal. Lets stop them. The resource should be shared responsibly, not used as an election fund for those who make decisions based on a re-election stradegy.

Would it be better accepted by the general public if this initiative was as an advocate for salmon, rather than equality for the sportsfisherman?


Go Hawks!!