Guess that depends on your definition of "right." If you mean "hawkish ultra-conservative of the neocon right wing" I'd say you are absolutely correct. If you mean "right, as in correct," well, your wrong. Krauthammer has been nothing more than a rationalist for the administration's history revisionists. He's the GOP's version of Maureen Dowd or Michael Moore.

By the way, if the idea of going back to the Security Counsel is so absurd, why then is the White House contemplating that very thing? Of course Krauthammer will simply rationalize this little bit of history revision also.