My point is the past is the past. Bush seems to want to deny his past and exploit Kerry's. Umm by Bush i guess i mean Bush supporters not the man himself. I have not heard anyone making an issue of Bush's arrest .

SO you have to choose.. If kerrys record in Vietnam is valid then so is Bush's history including his arrest record.. you cannot havit it both ways. Either the past is valid now or it's not...

Also if you look into Kerry's record you'll find that at the time kerry's commanding officers wrote glowing reports about him. Why is it they are changing their story now?? Were they lying then or atr they lying now???