Do you know it was not brought into the country by the foreign combatants that we are constantly hearing about (I am first to admit far fetched but still possible)?

My point is this, I obviously need more proof than you do on this issue. If the additional proof is brought forward I for one will have no problem saying I am wrong.

"Do you know what the odds are that one of(if not) the most toxic agents kown to man ,specifically banned by a treaty ending up in a road side bomb in a war zone by accident are?"

First off, I never claimed it was there by accident. Secondly, it is common knowledge that Saddam had previously used this type of ordinance in the past, increasing the odds that there may be unspent ordinance still laying around old battlegrounds. If you would do some research on unexploded ordinance you would find that it is not all to uncommon for there to be quite a bit of it on battlefields. Further along this line of thinking I do not believe it to be far fetched that people have scavenged the unspent ordinance and may be using it against coalition forces. Why not use it conventionally otherwise?

If a dead body is found on your property does that make you a murderer? Even if your entire community has been accusing you of it for years? No there needs to be a link between you and the dead body. It's called evidence and proof!