Of course not. But I don't think he should be trying to use WWII as another play on the public's hearts to gather emotional support for his Iraq debacle. He's trying to conjure up images of Hitler's reign to keep the people scared and supportive. See Goering.

Dave Ross had a guy on the other day that spoke of how the neocons are so frightened of another Nazi-like regime that they use WWII as justification for invading any country that may pose a threat.

I still think comparing terrorism in the world to the Nazi occupation of Europe is flawed. Terrorism is not a government that you can identify and replace with a more suitable one. It's a tactic, like using a gun versus using a knife. You cannot erradicate terrorism any more than you can rid the world of every knife or sharp object.

You have to learn to predict it, protect from it, and repel it. What makes all that more difficult is invading a country for whatever-reason-of-the-week is, wasting billions of dollars on that folly, and neglecting our own shores.