The P Line may not have the abrasion resistance. This is where the practical use of the analysis may get tricky. The real question is; Do lines fail because fish teeth nick them, and moderate tension leds to failure, or do they fail primarily from tension?

If the answer is primarily tension than PLine xtra tough is better, but if abraided line is more responsible for failure, than maybe the Maxima makes for better leaders. In either case, the PLine xtra tough would make a decent mainline for baitcasters. It has significantly stronger tensile strength than the same diameter lines from anything else I tested. And just as significantly, its ability to retain strength after its been stressed to near failure, is exceptional. I suppose that's not important if you respool your line each time you have to break off from a snag.

If that 20 pound wild steelie makes a blazing run upstream, and the only way to keep from being spooled is by really buttoning down the drag, 0.014 diam PLine xtra is going to get the job done before the same sized Maxima. Likewise if your driftfishing near heavy structure then Maxima would probably be a better choice.

I find it interesting the amount of testing rifle hunters will do with different grain bullets, different loads, different shaped bullets, in order to improve accuracy by an inch at a hundred yards. Especially since most kills occur under 200 yards. But how many anglers have actually wet their fishing line and tested it on a scale?

If your not open to consider that there might be a better way to do things, or that the performance of your gear has no room for improvement, then I can guarantee you will see no improvement.