Nothing is done at NOF until the final gavel falls next Friday. WDFW was meeting with the tribes today to outline the recommendations that came out of Lynnwood.

I'm not sure of all the protocols, but calls/contacts with WDFW staff, the Commission, and cc's to your local legislators might help. Of course, some of the local legislators don't seem to give a damn about recreational impacts, they just want their commercial buddies to make a few more bucks and damn the resource.

If someone can attend the NOF meetings at Sea-Tac, you can buttonhole the players and push for changes. The following is a copy of the Commission policy on the NOF process. Not sure how much it might help, but it gives you some idea of where the Commission, is coming from.

The key words are to minimize impacts on depressed stocks. I'd be making the argument that the rivers/stocks should be split and managed accordingly. WDFW does that around Puget Sound. They also talk about sharing the conservation responsibility in the Grays Harbor section.

It galls me that some folks think the state owes them a living based on the resources that belong to everyone. The sports take a lot of hits in the name of conservation, but you don't see the commercials or tribes being restricted in a similar manner. And then, when the returns aren't there, the same folks are lined up hat in hand asking the government to bail them out, buy their licenses, etc. How many other private businesses get similar treatment......
POLICY DECISION

POLICY TITLE: 2007-2008 North of Falcon POLICY NUMBER: C-3608

Cancels: C-3608, 2005-2006 North of Falcon Policy Effective Date: February 2, 2007
Termination Date: December 31, 2008

See Also: POL C-3001 Approved by: / /s/ Jerry Gutzwiler
Chair, Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission
DOWNLOAD: Signed copy of POL-C3608 (PDF)


North of Falcon Policy

This Policy will guide Department staff in considering conservation, allocation, in-season management, and monitoring issues associated with the co-management process known as the North of Falcon. When considering management issues, Department staff will insure that decisions are made consistent with the Department's statutory authority, U.S. v. Washington, U.S. V. Oregon, the Endangered Species Act, the Puget Sound Chinook Harvest Management Plan, Pacific Salmon Treaty, the Pacific Fishery Management Council's Framework Salmon Management Plan, pertinent state/tribal agreements, and the applicable Fish and Wildlife Commission policies.

Harvest Management

General

On a statewide basis, fishing opportunities will be provided when they can be directed at healthy wild and hatchery stocks while minimizing impacts on depressed stocks. ·
When assessed from a statewide perspective, fishing directed at chinook, coho, pink, sockeye, or chum salmon will not be exclusively reserved for either sport or commercial users. ·
When managing sport fisheries, meaningful recreational fishing opportunities will be distributed equitably across fishing areas and reflect the diverse interests of fishers, including retention and catch and release fisheries. ·
The Department will seek non-treaty fishing access to unutilized portions of treaty harvest allocations through the implementation of pre-season agreements, taking into consideration changes in abundance, fishery conflicts, and factors that may influence attainment of spawning escapement objectives.
Sockeye, Chum, and Pink Salmon

Marine area harvest management objectives for chum, pink, and sockeye stocks, except for Puget Sound-origin sockeye, in priority order, are to (1) provide the majority of harvest to the commercial fisheries, and (2) identify and provide meaningful recreational opportunities.
For fisheries directed at Lake Washington sockeye, the first 200,000 non-treaty harvest will be provided to recreational fishers. If the allowable non-treaty is above this level, commercial harvest directed at this stock may be considered.
Chinook and Coho Salmon

The Puget Sound harvest management objectives for chinook and coho stocks, in priority order, are to (1) provide meaningful recreational fishing opportunities, and (2) identify and provide opportunities for commercial harvest. When managing sport fisheries in this region, recreational opportunities will be distributed equitably across fishing areas, considering factors such as the: uniqueness of each area, the availability of opportunities for various species in each area throughout the season, desire to provide high levels of total recreational opportunity, and biological impacts.
Grays Harbor harvest management objectives shall include opportunities for both the recreational and commercial fisheries.
Columbia River harvest management regimes shall be developed in cooperation with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife representatives. Commercial and recreational fishing opportunity will be scheduled to optimize the non-treaty harvest of chinook and coho and to provide a balanced opportunity to each fleet. When developing recreational and commercial fishing options, the Department shall consider fair and reasonable catch opportunity, stability and duration of fisheries, as well as sharing of the conservation responsibility.
Willapa Bay harvest management shall be consistent with Willapa Bay Framework management objectives. The following general intent shall apply: Willapa Bay harvest management objectives shall include meaningful opportunities for both recreational and commercial fisheries.
Pacific Ocean harvest shall be managed consistent with the Pacific Fishery Management Council's Framework Salmon Management Plan and the National Standards that provide for fair and equitable allocation of fishing privileges among various fishers.
In-Season Management

When in-season management actions are taken, they should be implemented in a manner that is consistent with pre-season conservation and harvest management objectives and fishery intent developed through the North of Falcon process.
Monitoring

Fishery participants will be required to comply with fishery monitoring and evaluation programs designed to account for species and population impacts.
Gear and Fishery Conflicts

Recreational and commercial fisheries shall be structured to minimize gear and other fishery conflicts. Unanticipated fishery interaction issues identified in-season, including conflicts with fisheries directed at other species, shall be resolved by involving the appropriate sport and commercial representatives in a dispute resolution process managed by Department staff.
Incidental Mortalities

Limits on the incidental mortalities of non-targeted species will be defined as necessary for commercial and recreational fisheries. Management regimes will include strategies to limit seabird mortalities consistent with the federal Migratory Bird Act.
Communications

The Department shall strive to make ongoing improvements for effective public involvement during the North of Falcon planning process and annual salmon fishery implementation, incorporating the following intents:
include representatives of recreational and commercial participants at North of Falcon as observers during appropriate state/tribal discussions of fishery issues.
maintain a timely record of all significant fishery discussions and decisions during North of Falcon process to all interested parties, both at the meetings and following the process.
use a variety of communication tools to effectively communicate with the public and receive timely input on pre-season planning and in-season fishery implementation, including use of the Department web site.
Other Species

The Fish and Wildlife Commission's policy on Lower Columbia Sturgeon Management (POL-C3001), effective January 1, 2006, shall guide pre-season and in-season planning of Columbia River and coastal sturgeon fisheries and related incidental impacts. Management of Willapa Bay sturgeon fisheries will be further guided by Willapa Bay Framework management objectives.
Delegation of Authority
On November 10, 1999, the Fish and Wildlife Commission permanently delegated the authority to the Director to make harvest agreements with Northwest treaty tribes and other governmental agencies, and adopt permanent and emergency regulations resulting from the agreements made during the annual North of Falcon process.