Jerry,

I hear ya! I attended the meeting in Sequim and there was about 15-20 people in attendence.

All,

The meeting objective is pretty simple. Have a meeting, present the SSMP to the public, answer any questions, gather imput and encourage written comments by the end of the month. Anyone who cares about the future of steelhead fishing should support their desired alternative. Pretty simple really.

One problem associated with these meetings (often true with this BB) is it allows the general public to vent off to WDFW on topics that aren't related to the topic at hand.

My opinion? I would like to see Alternative 1 adopted but doubt it will since there won't be enough budget to fund all the changes. However Alternative 2 (preferred) is still better than 3 and 4. An Alternative will be selected for adoption. Which one will you support? Or will you just ignore the issue altogether? The other comments and opinions on this thread doesn't really address the issue now does it?
_________________________
www.catchercraft.com