Originally Posted By: Kari Neumeyer
Originally Posted By: Tillerdemon
This is a very sad deal!!! From what i understand the tribes presented this fishery at the very last minute at the North of Falcon meetings creating quite a upstir... Seems that it not only will be going on in the skagit river but in the bay as well and it's a gill net fisherey with a Bycatch qouto of 7000 Chinnook.. Would be nice if a repersenative that attended the NOF meetings coulg fill us in on all exacts.


Just to clarify a bit, the Skagit sockeye fishery was part of the tribes' original proposal at North of Falcon. At the first joint NOF meeting in March, the co-managers tabled it for later discussion, so that may be why there was the perception it was introduced at the last minute.

You're absolutely right, the fishery does have a bay component with a bycatch ceiling for chinook. Like all fisheries (tribal, non-tribal, etc...), impacts from this fishery were accounted for in the decision-making process. In terms of impacts on Stilly fish, the breakdown of tribal to non-tribal impacts is something along the lines of 27 percent tribal and the rest non-tribal. I can get specific numbers if you want.

It’s been more than 30 years since Swinomish had a sockeye fishery here, and this fishery is the result of many years of enhancement efforts by the tribes and Seattle City Light that have increased the return to Baker Lake.

You can see the entire list of agreed-to fisheries at http://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/tribal/2008-09agreement.pdf

If you have questions, feel free to call WDFW, or the individual tribes. Each tribe has a hotline with up-to-date information about their fisheries: 360-466-4112 (Swinomish and Sauk-Suiattle); 360-854-7095 (Upper Skagit).

~~~~~~~
Kari Neumeyer
North Sound Information Officer
Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
360-424-8226
kneumeyer@nwifc.org
www.nwifc.org



Just thought folks would like to know NWIFC is completely wrong here…..unless the Dept posted the FRAM results wrong here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/final_chinook_coho_fram_model_runs_2008-2009.pdf

The FRAM model using the agreed to list of fisheries is located on the WDFW site click on Fishing/Shellfishing > Salmon/Steelhead > Under “Other Information” link labeled “Final Chinook (2108) and Coho (0824) FRAM model runs based on 08-09 Agreed-to Fisheries”

In Table 6A it shows the ER on natural stocks by stock and fishery. Seems like the NonTribal total ER is 58.5% ….which means the Indian rate is 41.5% of the total (100%-58.5%=41.5), not the 27% you mention here Kari….could you explain yourself? Looks like the final FRAM run is a new posting on the WDFW website, or was this data not available to you when you quoted the tribes had 27% of the total impacts on Stilly? I thought through NOF the tribes and state constantly run FRAM models to see what the list of fisheries are actually doing….so why would you initially state a percentage that was lower than what was modeled in the final preseason agreement...seems like another attempt to mask what is really a Chinook/Steelhead fishery by calling it a sockeye fishery….and how many sockeye were expected to be caught by now….and how many actually have been?
huh