So you ask questions about terrorism, those that use the tactic, and how we should treat them, yet the administration that has been more deeply involved and influenced by terrorism than any other administration in history cannot be included in the conversation? If we cannot discuss the bush administration, then what metric do we use to compare the treatment of POWs as it pertains to terrorism?

Most educated people would interpret my above reply, "However, with the suspension of habeas corpus thousands of men and boys were rounded up and imprisoned as enemy combatants so to skirt international law" as fighting crime with crime. Sorry my reply is too obscure to provoke thought in you.