That article is nothing short of a bunch of B.S. Compromise? Come on. So how many times are we going to compromise before we compromise our asses out of public land use. The law states (U.S. Constitution Ammendment 14) that "the government can only take away land for public use." Does that mean that they can take away land use from one part of the public and give it to another part of public for their own use? Apparently so. Sounds like B.S. to me. Knee jerk reactions usually end up coming back to bite us in the end. Wouldn't it be ironic if a hiker gets killed by a bear in the next couple of years? What then? Kick the bears out so the hikers can still hike around. Double standards, double standards. Guarantee the bear gets taken out and they get to stay. So its OK if hippies take out the bear because it mauls a hiker. But not OK for a hunter to harvest a bear. Oh my god, my head hurts from this assanying stupidity.