Originally Posted By: AuntyM
Guys,

I think we might have a problem here. In reviewing the commission's proposed crab policy, the wording in the sections for "region 1, 2 and 3" uses instead of the alternatives of A, B and C, (link above) they say alternatives 1, 2 and 3.

Call me paranoid, but when they cite alternatives that are not readily provided, and the wording is "Provide the commercial fishery harvest
opportunities beginning in the early fall time-frame and manage it in a manner that maximizes the ex-vessel value,"

It appears to leave the door open for a decrease in the recreational daily limit to protect commercial harvests.

I hope crabbers will be able to get out to these meetings. The short notice of this and other WDFW meetings in the last few weeks does NOT inspire confidence.


Ahhhhhhhhhhhhem, should I start practising the "I Told Yah So's" & "It's STILL all about ALLOCATION POUNDAGE"???????
_________________________
Upstanding Member of the Porcupine Social Club, ergo, the Old Prick in the Upper Left Hand Corner.

AuntyM -- What Crab Audit???? Not That POS Senior AssHat Published!!!!

Hey Mr Childers, have you corrected that Scofflaw Spreadsheet Yet?????