bd,

No, the right thing to do is to have the justices of the Supreme Court decide what the Constitution says.............because that's what they do.

The 2nd amendment doesn't say individuals have the right to bear arms, but the SC has interpreted the "well-regulated militia" to mean the individual. If you want to go with the simple spelling in the Constitution, then your days of individual firarm ownership are over.

Unless, of course, you want to admit that it wasn't the intent of the Constitution to forbid you, the individual, to bear arms, and you want to continue living with the SC's interpretation of the 2nd amendment, rather than the simple language in the Constitution which never mentions individual firearm ownership.