I'm very pessimistic that anyone could ever be successfully prosecuted for flossing. That is, it's very difficult to successfully prosecute someone for retaining a fish that was hooked and landed in a manner that allowed a fish that did not actively pursue the bait/lure to be reduced to possession; particularly if the fish is hooked inside the mouth.

The best we can do is enact gear restrictions, such as making it illegal to have a leader longer than say, 24 inches. But then the violation is simply having a leader that's too long. The issue of "flossing" never enters the equation. It's also called "guilt by association". Your leader is too long so you must have been flossing, therefore you're guilty.

Again, I am less concerned about flossers than I am about intentional, blatant, and obvious snagging.

Then again, this debate is not about the fish, or other problems such as habitat loss, or Tribal netting, etc. It's about us anglers, and how we pursue our hobby.