I disagree that some of those should be considered flagrant. Fouls 1, 2, 6 I wouldn't consider flagrant, although 6 was a stupid foul because the opposing player clearly had the rebound.

#3 was a hard foul with his bicep while his arm was extended straight up. If you really wanted to foul someone hard and with meaning, you wouldn't do it like that...however, it looked like he purposely followed through with his arm to the other guy's face and the ball was no where near the point of contact. So maybe 34 has really poor motor/body skills.

#4 was very intentional as it was a straight up push as he had no chance of recovering the loose ball and was probably ticked that he let the smaller guy tip it away after he initially got the rebound. Again dumb/frustration foul.

#5 was bad but it looked worse because he was high in the air during the layup and had a hard fall after the foul. But the smug look on his face didn't help matters and his over-aggressive fouling prior would have warranted a flagrant foul, technical or ejection at that point.

Nothing wrong with playing aggressive and fouling hard to prevent any chance of a three point play. But rather than knock a guy down with a hard foul and walk away with a smug grin, help the guy up. There did seem to be more hard fouls by Connell than a normal game but just because a guy hits the floor doesn't mean an automatic flagrant foul.