CWUgirl,


If you both look back at what I wrote.....I said it wasn't WISE to break the law. From what I GATHER you both think I supported the action of the gents in question. Well, the law is the law, and I never said what they done was right!!! I do look at different situations with a open mind, the world in general is not as black/white as most want to be purists claim. YOU EVER SPEED?? have you turned yourself in for it.....well???? People love to point fingers at the other guy.......never looking at themselves. We ALL have broken a law maybe some blatently, other by chance. OH YA.......YOUR PURISTS????


Now, lets look at what they did, broke a law.......A questionable law as far as i'm concerned, but yet still a law.

The concept that extremist will "excuse" hunting if it is done legally is a "RED FLAG" of stupidity. They could care less, killing is killing. Remember when hound hunting, and baiting were legal??? I don't remember many, if any, complaints from the general non-hunting public. I wasn't until extremists made a big stink that things changed, and not for the better. Now people like you think ratting people both hunting, and fishing, bringing it to a news organization will make things better.......your FOOLS!!! This in no way will ever make us as hunters look better. The public has been FOOLED into thinking baiting, and hound hunting are cruel, and you think that bringing it up will change thier mind??? AGAIN, FOOLS!! Hunters are going to put the last nail in thier coffin trying to do the "just" thing Sure you can sit there and say "they were breaking the law" but you forget when they put a measure up to the general public ,YOU like it, or not, are bunched up with these unethical, law breaking hunters. So regardless if you like it, or not, I think it is wise to let the game department deal with hunters within our own ranks, because news worthy stories of baiting, which people will probally continue, will only kill our sport hunting all together.......Law abidding, or not!!


CHUMSTER