Originally Posted By: Dogfish
When we looked at the Grayland wind turbines on a tour of Grays Harbor they discussed the cost, and the payback over time, and it penciled out. Then I asked about any grant funding and tax credits they had received, and after factoring that into the mix, the wind turbines were not sustainable.

I think wind power has a place in the future, but it needs to be self reliant, and sustainable.


Not sure why the change. You didnt mention how much they recieved. Is it a capital cost or cost of operations, that comes up short?