Originally Posted By: IrishRogue
Originally Posted By: RowVsWade
Originally Posted By: IrishRogue
IWhile I'm not deep on this, bolt-action rifles seem pretty different from gatling guns. Having some clip/assault limits seem reasonable.


Why?


Because I believe "in for a penny, in for a pound" is flawed logic. Nearly all governing results in taking what is inevitably a spectrum, and coding it into discrete groups. Do I believe people should be allowed to own weapons? Yes. Do I believe people should be allowed to own any weapon imaginable? Nope.

Let's take explosives as a counter example -- Somewhere between a firecracker and a 50 megaton hydrogen bomb is a line. We can debate its location, but there's a line.

Why is it so difficult to understand that a similar line is reasonable on guns?


But since a bolt action is just as accurate, hits just as hard and shoots just as far as a semi or 'clip'/'assault' rifle (whatever the f.uck that is) I suppose just renaming a 50 megaton hydrogen bomb and calling it a firecracker would make you sleep better.

Nice try Nancy but it's obvious you have no idea what you're talking about. Stick with graphs, ad hoc arguments and other meaningless banter, inow things you excell at.
_________________________
"...the pool hall I loved as a kid is now a 7-11..."

If you don't like our prices bring your wife down and we'll dicker.