Originally Posted By: AP a.k.a. Kaiser D
For discussion, if things like accuracy and distance are part of the equation then wouldn't potential damage per unit of time also factor in?

As far as taking out an individual, the most simplistic gun would most likely work.


The .22 caliber rifle has probably killed more people and poached more game than all others combined. Going by numbers, that would seem to be a logical place to start a banning campaign right?

Guns aren't the problem and never will be. We always try and address the symptoms without treating the cause. I am "lucky" to live in a state with very liberal gun laws. It really simplifies things, I just assume that everyone is armed and conduct myself accordingly. Victory through superior firepower and/or proficiency.

Todd is right in that the real life examples of what so many are scared of are few and far between. That having been said, you can't legally own certain guns in certain places. Is big brother looking over your shoulder, hell no.
_________________________
I am still not a cop.

EZ Thread Yarn Balls

"I don't care how you catch them, as long as you treat them well and with respect." Lani Waller in "A Steelheader's Way."