Okay ... here's a discussion my roomate in Alaska (another fishing guide) and I were having ... the Boldt Decision only specifies the RIGHT TO HARVEST ... not the RIGHT TO NET ... perhaps the Indian lawyers see BAN as being able to have some effect legally under the decision's language ... maybe that is the real reason they claim to be against it??? Any thoughts? Todd???
_________________________
Seen ... on a drive to Stam's house:



"You CANNOT fix stupid!"