There are many different opinions of what is best for the fish and what is best for the sportsfisherman. Some I agree with and some I don't. It is hard for me to sign on, even if just by name, to such a vague concept as "if we do what we have always done, we will get what we have always gotten". What makes this such a hard nut to crack is,using your example, for every person for c&r of native steelhead there seems to be just as many against it. I know this is one of the more divisive issues, the point is everyone wants to "do whats best for the fish" but when it comes time to define what that means no one can agree. The devil is in the details. I'm not saying this is a lost cause, it just needs a little more definition of the direction this group is going to take.