Originally Posted By: Jason Beezy
I wish I had something substantial to add but I will say this, I work with an open carry guy, he was wearing his gun at work, totally unnecessarily, and made folks a little nervous so now he carries it in a little bag everywhere on his shoulder. He has now been galvanized by him being asked to not open carry and daily goes on bitch tirades about how he has his rights. It is clear that a lot of his identity, to him, is wrapped up in his gun. It takes up a lot of his mental energy and he dwells on it a lot and feels embarrassed and hurt that people don't like his gun. He of course says the gun is there to defend himself which makes sense hypothetically. So my question is, who has the mental health issue here? The people who are nervous about a gun at work or the guy who is so paranoid he needs to take everywhere and can't feel like himself without his gun and has it in a little man purse?

I think NickD90 answered the above succinctly.

Originally Posted By: Jason Beezy
I'm not talking rights, I'm asking who is cuckoo? I personally feel like this guy has an overactive imagination, lacks statistical comprehension, and is paranoid.

I think that you have an interesting point of view, because the gun violence statistics are the same for him as they are for the anti gun zealots, the issue is that their reactions to those statistics are diametrically opposed to his. I think if he "has an overactive imagination, lacks statistical comprehension, and is paranoid" then judging from many of the reactions of the anti gun zealots, that they must also have those tendencies.
_________________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
Winston Churchill

"So it goes." Kurt Vonnegut jr.