Hey, I'll fess up, I was going to vote for Carlson even before I heard that he was in favor of a net ban. Locke is a decent guy too but John has a way of making things happen (three strikes your out, got rid of that ridiculous affirmative action thing, etc). He has refused campaign contributions from the commercial fish lobbyists and has IMO kind of stuck his neck out on this net-ban deal so I think that sport fishers ought to either support him or pressure Locke to match the policy. What else we got?