Originally Posted By: OncyT
Larry B., I agree that the two violations are not the same. I was just trying to point out that, as you note there are folks in both the treaty and non-treaty fisheries that don’t follow the rules, but that does not mean that the respective management entity, either the tribe in question or the State of Washington are responsible for those violations. Just for enlightenment on the topic of poachers, as a final post on this thread, I thought I would share some of my experience with some serious local non-Indian poachers, which really do exist.

I live in Olympia, and anytime anybody has fisheries open (treaty or non-treaty) for crab in southern Puget Sound or Hood Canal, there is a gentleman that comes into a local bar a couple of miles from my house selling crab. He is not Indian or associated with Indians (as that sort would not be welcome in that particular bar) and is not a commercial crabber, but he has crabs for sale every week. Regulars in the bar know him and how he comes by these crab and really don’t care. They support him wholeheartedly.

If you know the right places and/or the right names to drop, you can find this sort of thing all over – well at least every place I have looked. This includes places (mostly bars) from Shelton to Quilcene, and also includes a few of the well-known places we all pass that are located right on the Canal and Highway 101. So despite years of enforcement, there still appears to be the same counter culture of natural resource thieves that I ran across 30 years ago when I worked on the Canal. Since there has been more development of full-time residences on the Canal, I doubt that it is as extensive as it once was, but it does still exist.

I know that area well, and am also known in a lot of those places, so the thought has crossed my mind that maybe it is not as wide-spread as I think. Maybe because of my connections, I was able to find those sorts of folks. That thought changed a couple of years ago, when I went to stay at Birch Bay for a few days for the first time in my life. After checking in and poking around for a few hours, I ended up in a local bar right next to where I was staying. After a couple of drinks and some conversation with folks in the bar, which turned to discussion about fishing, I was invited to participate in an illegal crab fishery the next day by one of the bar patrons. Even though I had never met him, he gave me his name and number to call to join him if I wished. After he left I talked to several of the patrons there asking about this fellow, and they all assured me that it would be perfectly fine to join him in this as many of them had done it before, without any problem.

I have more stories to share (Curt and Hal might be more interested in a few) but I hope I’ve made my point. Like you, I recognize that there are outlaws in treaty and non-treaty fisheries, some of them much more serious than not turning in crab or salmon CRC’s. Their existence, however, does not mean that the respective management entities condone or support them.

Last post on this thread.


I will respectfully disagree with the following: "but that does not mean that the respective management entity, either the tribe in question or the State of Washington are responsible for those violations." Any governmental body with both authority and responsibility to enforce its own laws and turns a blind eye to violations/violators is responsible. I simply can not and do not believe that the large scale tribal poaching cases of recent years occurred without tribal officials (1) being aware and doing nothing until the situation was brought to their attention or, (2) being totally incompetent, or (3) benefiting in some manner. As discussed earlier those communities are small and in my opinion far too small for such large scale poaching activities to fly under the tribal radar.

As far as NT illegal sales go I had the opportunity to testify to the Commission during the hearings leading up to the new crab policy and included in my comments that anyone testifying to having been approached to illegally purchase crab should also be able to testify that they had reported that contact to WDFW. Turns out that the individual testifying after me was from north sound and operated a retail shellfish outlet and testified against the new policy saying that he was regularly approached to (illegally) purchase recreationally harvested crab. But apparently he had not been so "offended" by those illegal offers to report them but on the other hand did consider those illegal offers serious enough to make them the basis for his opposition to the new policy.





Edited by Larry B (05/17/16 02:04 PM)
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!

It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)