The science is probably pretty close to correct. In fact, I would argue that it probably paints a rosier picture of angler impacts than what is reality, particularly when fishing in saltwater, where salmon lose scales very easily when handled or even netted. Add to that the fact that the test fishers are probably better than average fish handlers, and they probably do us a favor with the numbers they arrive at in their studies.

In general, I think it's poor form for us to try and bend the science (even when we question it) so it allows us more time on the water. I hate that sport fishers always bear the brunt of the conservation burden, but if we truly care about the future of fishing, we'll continue to do it.

I think we (Tribes and sports) should join forces to end the outrageous intercept of OUR fish by Alaska and BC. That's the best way to instantly improve our fisheries. More fish returning to WA waters, plus appropriate management of those fish, should equal a more sustainable, more productive set of fisheries for all parties, for years to come.