Reeltruth- I only make a habit of keeping track of that type of thing from people who repeatedly engage me on issues,(i.e. yourself and Dan S. among others) and it is a loose accounting at that. My point was to help you see that you were making a personal attack rather than an affirmative argument for your cause. Personal attacks tell me that you are out of substance and are conceding the point.(otherwise you would just be mean-spirited)

I would like to revisit my question from earlier. Please, someone, define for me the term "rich". How much money do you have to have to be rich. Also, what is wrong with being rich. I don't know too many poor people with employees.....Would you not agree that without fishless days, catching fish would lose some of its luster? I happen to believe that by moving through being poor one is better able to appreciate being wealthy. Perhaps the glory of accomplishment is lost on left-leaners.

Backlash- I will say it again, the bottom 46% of wage earners pay NO federal income tax and as such cannot benefit from a tax cut. What you seem to be advocating is taking money from the richest 1% and giving it to the "bottom of the food chain". Is that what you want, the redistribution of wealth???? If so, what if someone thinks he needs your car because he can't afford one? Will you let him take it or will you call a cop?