There has been a lot of noise recently about GW being impeached. Standard reasons used are:
1. Lying to the American public to get us involved in Iraq.
2. The Valerie Plame (sp?) affair.
3. Being a general dumb*ss.
While certainly no supporter of W and clearly dismayed by what the GOP did with Clinton and impeachment, I would caution all that impeachment and conviction should be a well thought out, sober action that needs to be weighed in regard to the general good of the Nation.
Impeachment of the President has happened 3 times in our history and never has the Senate convicted. The Senate probably would have convicted Nixon, but he resigned prior to that happening. In both the modern cases, the opposition party held the majority in the House when Impeachment was debated. So, in W's case, he is really only at risk of impeachment if the Dems can take control of the House in the 2006 election.
If the Dems do win the majority in the House, I would strongly caution them not to impeach. It would set our system on its ear if they did that. We would not only have Election cycles, but impeachment cycles as well. Just as many thought that Clinton's impeachment was payback by the GOP for Nixon's impeachment, we would run the risk of Government by brinksmanship and revenge.
Just some random thoughts by someone who thinks that W deserves to be impeached and convicted, but thinks that it is better for our Nation to leave well enough alone. BTW, I think W might be able to beat reason #3.