#796891 - 11/02/12 01:45 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
21 WA Legislators sent a letter to the WDFW Commission yesterday. Once a link is published somewhere, you'll be able to read it.
Really does it go like this, CCA's ballot measure is toast please save our asses.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#796893 - 11/02/12 01:47 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: slabhunter]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
Never said anything wasn't documented but don't know of any other fisheries on the west coast where whites can't sell it but tribes can.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#796902 - 11/02/12 02:03 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
HSRG is an old document now, you have the Elwha and White Salmon running free there's 1000's of acres of habitat being opened up in the lower river. Selective fishing and habitat and hatchery reform aren't going to compliment each other but I don't have the 400 hours to spare to try and explain why to you.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#796916 - 11/02/12 02:50 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: SBD]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 01/17/04
Posts: 3761
Loc: Sheltona Beach
|
Never said anything wasn't documented but don't know of any other fisheries on the west coast where whites can't sell it but tribes can. It's all about harvest method. CR reform needs to happen. Gill net sales need to be documented. Not some eazy we keep the first of the season . cRa*
Edited by slabhunter (11/02/12 03:04 PM)
_________________________
When we are forgotten, we cease to exist . Share your outdoor skills.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#796969 - 11/02/12 05:13 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: SBD]
|
Spawner
Registered: 02/06/08
Posts: 511
|
Selective fishing and habitat and hatchery reform aren't going to compliment each other but I don't have the 400 hours to spare to try and explain why to you. And we're very grateful.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#796985 - 11/02/12 06:04 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: SBD]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 10/22/09
Posts: 3045
Loc: University Place and Whidbey I...
|
HSRG is an old document now, you have the Elwha and White Salmon running free there's 1000's of acres of habitat being opened up in the lower river. Selective fishing and habitat and hatchery reform aren't going to compliment each other but I don't have the 400 hours to spare to try and explain why to you. Do you really think that it will take 400 hours to explain why selective fishing and habitat and hatchery reform aren't going to say nice things about one another?
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!
It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#796995 - 11/02/12 07:02 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: Larry B]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
That was just for Aunty but there is a thread on Ifish where the mark rates of the selective fishing test were just posted. Those aren't even close to the rates we were fishing on when HSRG was put together, late coho was 85% + not so feasible anymore.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#797029 - 11/02/12 08:49 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
Misery Loves Company 
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#797069 - 11/03/12 12:18 AM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: SBD]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 12/15/02
Posts: 4000
Loc: Ahhhhh, damn dog!
|
Misery Loves Company SBD meet Hank and F n F!  Fishy
_________________________
NRA Life member
The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.
I think name-calling is the right way to handle this one/Dan S
We're here from the WDFW and we're here to help--Uhh Ohh!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798319 - 11/07/12 10:33 AM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: Fast and Furious]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Day after election and how do all the CCA members feel? Cheated? Good news is we'll have decent hatchery fishing a few more years! Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798354 - 11/07/12 11:34 AM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798364 - 11/07/12 11:53 AM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Had they not used the word "ban" on the voters card, heck it might have passed....
All those Oregon Lemmings seen the word "ban" and just voted no!
Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798368 - 11/07/12 12:06 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: stlhdr1]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
Darn those idiots at Oregons Supreme Court who wrote the ballot title.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798374 - 11/07/12 12:16 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
Big_Daddy
Unregistered
|
Hey don't despair......the Oregon Governer will make it all better.
How do I know....because he said so and polictians never lie.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798380 - 11/07/12 12:24 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
Well I've never lost one either but had a few run over on purpose though, someones expensive lower unit didn't sound so great after one episode. It's just turned in to a religious war nothing else, no data to back up the claims. Oregon Voters can read or listen to the news that runs are increasing to levels that haven't been seen since the dams were built and then a group trys to float a ballot measure claiming just the opposite. Don't know what to tell you other than I'll keep backing the Tribes and Columbia Riverkeeper. Glad to hear your pot measure passed so the night wasn't a total loss for you.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#798400 - 11/07/12 01:02 PM
Re: Voters Could Still Ban Gill Nets on CR
[Re: ]
|
clown flocker
Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 3731
Loc: Water
|
Im soooooooooooo glad you represent CCA and now watch politicans dump your group left and right.
_________________________
There's a sucker born every minute
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
692
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11505 Members
17 Forums
73112 Topics
827562 Posts
Max Online: 6695 @ 03/13/26 11:11 AM
|
|
|