#85898 - 02/14/00 10:42 AM
Re: fish identification
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 03/29/99
Posts: 373
Loc: Seattle, WA USA
|
Whitefish possibly? They tend to school up during the winter. I saw a school under a bridge on the Sauk one year, they were packed like sardines and made a dark patch on the bottom that must have been twenty feet long by fifteen wide.
_________________________
PS
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#85900 - 02/14/00 02:13 PM
Re: fish identification
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 02/07/00
Posts: 419
Loc: Tacoma, Wa. USA
|
They also could be the dreaded Squawfish! I have caught so many little ones like that out of the Chehalis river that I could fill a 55 gallon drum.
_________________________
Just because I look big, dumb, and ugly, doesn't mean I am. It means I can stomp you for calling me it!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#85901 - 02/14/00 05:17 PM
Re: fish identification
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 08/04/99
Posts: 1432
Loc: Olympia, WA
|
I'm thinking whitefish, also. If your steelhead "0 for_" numbers get too frustrating, you might want to target those bony bugeaters. With a new GLoomis whitefish rod, some gold #14 Gammis, and a hydraulics permit to screen bait off the stream bottom, you could be experiencing fishing success. Since whitefish are neither commercially sought, nor actively managed by NMFS or WDFW, the future of this fishery appears bright. Current whitefish regs allow the retention of 15 fish with no minimum size. You will have one dilemma, though...all the fish you catch will be natives. Good fishun'.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
3 registered (28 Gage, Excitable Bob, 1 invisible),
847
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11505 Members
17 Forums
73034 Topics
826264 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|