#985669 - 02/17/18 01:37 PM
What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 11/11/08
Posts: 147
Loc: Central Park
|
The following Tacoma Public Utility site has graphs showing 2017 returns for various hatchery and natural origin fish. https://www.mytpu.org/file_viewer.aspx?id=65889It is interesting that most natural origin species had returns comparable to the ten year average while all hatchery origin species except springers had a dismal year compared to the ten year average. Two reasons jump out but there could be others. One is that the hatchery release has been cut substantially and the other is that natural origin fish survive difficult ocean conditions better than hatchery fish. Does anyone have a good answer for the discrepancy in returns? If the later reason is valid it has implications for the legislator and a number of fishermen who advocate ignoring HSRG (and potential ESA listings) and turning Puget Sound and Willapa bay into hatchery fish farms.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985673 - 02/17/18 02:02 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
We know that the steelhead smolts at least occasionally "vanish" before release. Just how good are the release numbers, given the issues that arise occasionally?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985687 - 02/17/18 05:33 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Carcassman]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 10/22/09
Posts: 3020
Loc: University Place and Whidbey I...
|
We know that the steelhead smolts at least occasionally "vanish" before release. Just how good are the release numbers, given the issues that arise occasionally? Some readers may not realize that was a rhetorical question. The disappearance/loss of 500K summer steelhead smolt and WDFW's inability to adequately explain that phenomenon calls into question prior year release numbers. Bottom line, at least for summer steelhead, don't try to make more out of the numbers than what they are.....poor. And then there were the drought and the blob.....
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!
It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985692 - 02/17/18 07:39 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
A factor too is that as we reduce hatchery releases, and wild smolts continue in the toilet, that the predators will take a higher percentage even if their populations are stable. Likely that losses to predators are taking a bigger whack.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985701 - 02/18/18 08:05 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 1385
|
Bottom line is that they lie and get away with it. Anymore, they do not want to spend the $$ they are obligated to by building the dams. They get away with it under guise of wild fish recovery. You can thank TU for that one.
_________________________
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.” – Ferris Bueller. Don't let the old man in!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985711 - 02/18/18 11:05 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
How can you be sure they actually lie? They use the best numbers they have. They may not be accurate or even close but the numbers are what they can afford to collect.
Same as estimating sport catch of salmon and steelhead. They depend on the integrity of the information provided. Give them garbage numbers, get garbage estimates.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985713 - 02/18/18 11:59 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Carcassman]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 1385
|
How can you be sure they actually lie? They use the best numbers they have. They may not be accurate or even close but the numbers are what they can afford to collect.
Same as estimating sport catch of salmon and steelhead. They depend on the integrity of the information provided. Give them garbage numbers, get garbage estimates. If you have faith in TCL accuracy and even our WDFW reports, then I have some swampland in Florida I'd like to sell you. I believe the powers that be purposely inflate the numbers to appear to follow their legal and financial obligation of dam mitigation. It's obvious returns are poor because they don't put in what they show on paper. My 2 cents.
_________________________
"Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.” – Ferris Bueller. Don't let the old man in!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985718 - 02/18/18 02:20 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
You are mixing apples and oranges in the argument. I didn't say the numbers were accurate, I said they were the best they could do at counting.
Years ago they put predator netting over a hatchery pond. Actually, this happened at many sites with similar results. Anyway, they stocked the pond with the normal number of coho. Then, sometime later in the rearing cycle they had a big die off. Why? Exceeded the pond's capacity because predation had been removing so many that it stayed at proper loading levels. At the time, the technology was fish in minus morts out left the number released. The predation loss was rather unseen; I think it was rats actually. Point being that assumptions get made and unless a new technology is installed you may be making a mistake. Lie? No. Purposefully inflated? No. Poor job of monitoring the fish. Yes.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985731 - 02/19/18 08:13 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Carcassman]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4413
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
|
CM makes one wonder as the pond population can be verified ( most managers do ) by how much growth off of feed fed. Growth above projections pond population below paper number. Growth below projections means the population is larger than paper numbers. It is how you verify populations. Thing is samples taken MUST be accurate. Get lazy you pay. It is very hard to loose track of a ponds population short of not doing your job.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985732 - 02/19/18 08:24 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
My Area code makes me cooler than you
Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 4549
|
When people are too worried about their next smoke break or to fat to waddle out and do their job this is what happens.
Pathetic that they could screw this fishery up. Even more pathetic that they can't just out right fire the bozos who screwed it all up.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985741 - 02/19/18 12:07 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
My Area code makes me cooler than you
Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 4549
|
26363464536723527 X 0 = NO FISH
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985751 - 02/19/18 02:46 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Rivrguy]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
Models, models, models. They fed all that food at Cowlitz to empty ponds. Who needs data when you have the best models? I mean, look at GH and WB. First class, state of the art models.......
Right?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985752 - 02/19/18 03:05 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
My Area code makes me cooler than you
Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 4549
|
A model without eyes on her is worthless.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985757 - 02/19/18 03:57 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 07/18/08
Posts: 237
|
The following Tacoma Public Utility site has graphs showing 2017 returns for various hatchery and natural origin fish. https://www.mytpu.org/file_viewer.aspx?id=65889It is interesting that most natural origin species had returns comparable to the ten year average while all hatchery origin species except springers had a dismal year compared to the ten year average. Two reasons jump out but there could be others. One is that the hatchery release has been cut substantially and the other is that natural origin fish survive difficult ocean conditions better than hatchery fish. Does anyone have a good answer for the discrepancy in returns? If the later reason is valid it has implications for the legislator and a number of fishermen who advocate ignoring HSRG (and potential ESA listings) and turning Puget Sound and Willapa bay into hatchery fish farms. These are just graphs of 2017 counts relative to a 10 year average. They don't tell you anything about the numbers of fish released to get those returns. These are only good for one thing - TPU gauging whether or not they are meeting their adult mitigation obligation. Survival varies annually as do hatchery release number (sometimes only slightly, sometimes hugely...as given in the example of summer sthd) The least informative of these numbers is the wild fish at the trap. Raw numbers will not inform whether hatchery and wild fish are performing the same, better, or worse - you need rate of return/unit released to do that.
Edited by JustBecause (02/19/18 04:18 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985759 - 02/19/18 04:42 PM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
Since the hatchery fish are marked and there are some level of selective fisheries out there it is logical that fewer hatchery fish would show back at the rack.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985801 - 02/20/18 11:32 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7431
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
Overall, the Cowlips seems to be a system where it should be easy to know what is going on. With the hatcheries in place you should get great numbers (quality) out, the fisheries in the rivers should be well monitored so catch can be accounted for, and so on.
It's kind like Willapa, where WDFW should show just how anadromous salmonids can be managed as they don't need anybody's permission to act. In the Cowlips they have all the traps (up and down) to really have good numbers on the fish. Especially with all the effort above Cowlitz Falls, there should be no lack of good information.
How are we going to succeed in managing, much less restoring, our resources if we muck up the areas with the fewest excuses?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#985850 - 02/21/18 10:01 AM
Re: What is going on with Cowltz NOR and HOR returns?
[Re: Soft bite]
|
My Area code makes me cooler than you
Registered: 01/27/15
Posts: 4549
|
Oh and so natural. Man just keeps fondling the fish.
Every since he has.............. the fish have retaliated by dying.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
3 registered (FishCatcher, wolverine, 1 invisible),
1446
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11498 Members
16 Forums
63779 Topics
645378 Posts
Max Online: 3001 @ 01/28/20 02:48 PM
|
|
|