https://www.scribd.com/document/383793025/Netyksho-Et-Al-Indictment.

All of the DNC and Clinton servers are now subject to defense discovery in an official proceeding for clients who will never set foot on American soil. Now its all going to be part of a public record.

Do you think maybe this is a bait and switch, like Mueller is really working for Trump and the "white hats". Could be, because why would you officially open your record books to attorneys who work for a foreign power related to a case which had no affect on the 2016 election and ultimately open up those records to the American people. Because these "hackers" had obtained records prior to destruction perpetrated by the DNC and Clinton officials, (Podesta), records that were not turned over to the FBI and justice department by the DNC and Clinton folks, tens of thousands of them.

Its evidence in an official proceeding, meaning all the seized data or at least some of it has been recovered and is part of a public record. Much more can be requested by the defense who will be an American Law Firm. The defendants are Russian Military. The Client is the Russian Federation who is the actual defendant, the names of the named indicted don't really mean anything as they were acting under official orders, most likely,,,, clandestine operation, same thing our intelligence services do day to day.

"organization one" in the indictment is obviously Wikileaks.

Obviously.

Fish on...

Todd

Think intel.
Think admissible.
Huber.
Think Utah 470.
45,000 sealed indictments & counting
Watch the water Rich.

what I don't really understand is how any of this other than hacking into actual voting machines could be considered a crime.

Digital communications are not secure and you have no expectation of privacy, everyone knows this, so how can any such data be proprietary? Our intelligence services gather, store, review and monitor all forms of digital communication and activity from everyone in this country as well as everyone in the world who uses the infrastructure. They don't need a search warrant to look in your email account, facebook, medical records, remotely access your phone, navigation system in your car, your remote power meter on your house, they have legal, (yet unconstitutional) access to anything hooked into the grid or cloud which sends data. They may not be able to use the information against you in a criminal proceeding without a warrant, but its easy to reverse engineer a warrant after you have already seen the evidence you need to justify.

this is how it works in the real world; when your a cop or in a group of cops, and you have a car on the side of the road you want to look inside of because you suspect a crime, but have no evidence of such crime and no witnesses are around, do you waste time getting a warrant not knowing if anything will be found, or if the car is unlocked do you search it first find what you are looking for and then reverse engineer a warrant?

How do you think this really works in many situations? Many times when I was a cop I have seen this, I might of even participated in it a time or two, do you want to spend a couple hours getting a warrant for nothing? Or do you feel better about spending the time if you already know what you are going to find? Just sayin.

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2605.htm

This is likely the truth on the matter.

Or... it's probably not.

Fish on...

Todd