At some point it is the state is going to have to go back to the courts and get the tribes held in contempt. They are required by Boldt to negotiate. If they are present but acting in bad faith, the state could appeal to the courts to intervene. If they are refusing to even negotiate at all, then they should be in trouble. Boldt is an active case, with on going requirements. I think of it the same as if someone had a divorce case with custody or alimony and one side just decided to ignore the agreement and do as they pleased. Obviously the injured party would have the right to recourse.