Not hard at all. I change my opinion whenever I'm presented with better information. At my age, I've honed a pretty refined BS meter. The most objective newspapers in the U.S. used to be the Wall Street Journal and The Christian Science Monitor. But the WSJ's objectivity disappeared with the Murdoch purchase, and I don't even know if the CSM is still in business. CNN used to be the more objective of the MSM, but has recently shifted to the right. The other MSM are decidedly left, and it shows, but at least they aren't the ball washers that FOX is. And then there's Newsmax, which totally gargles Trump's balls or whatever is hanging in his scrotum. Political debates are such a joke that they would flunk out in any high school debating forum. Interviews are better, but usually too softball to reveal much more than the interviewee's evasiveness. Analysis is usually best, but it too comes filtered through a biased lens.

Does this mean that you're admitting that Trump is more likely than not, a sex offender? Yesterday it was revealed that Trump's name appears over one million times in the half of the Epstein files that have been released. Pretty good for a guy who claims he hardly knew the guy.