Who is to say that our criteria for determining what is "representative" is not faulty?? I suppose you'll hit me with a bunch of statistical anlayses that state eight is the correct number for statistically significant representation, but I don't buy it.

Once WE decide what genes the fish should have WE have predetermined their destiny. I will restate that it is the arrogance of the human race, thinking we can just engineer our way out of our problems, what brought us to this dance in the first place...