Sard,

You have a very good point. It was the same point I tried to make and failed. Here is a quote from that same post on 6/24.

Quote:
One source is useless unless its put into context and the inherent bias is also factored.
And the Christian Science Monitor is still a great source. Which is odd, because without the "Monitor" part, Christian Science is an oxymoron.

And I'll troll that one reallll slooow. Nibble, nibble is that a bite?

Here let me save some of you some typing; I must hate America, little baby Jesus, puppy dogs, and ice cream.

(That was a joke for you sarcastically challenged)