Smalma

You said; "2) Having the anglers vote on issues. That would be a very cumbersome. There have been various angler preferences conducted over the years and not unexpectly anglers never unamiously agree on anything. Which is exactly my point - we anglers represent a wide range of opinions and ideas and rarely speak with a single voice. Perhaps the close there is to agreement is that WDFW doesn't have a clue but I'll bet there are even some WDFW supportors."

That's funny! "Not unexpectly anglers never unamiously agree on anything".

Well, that sounds just like our entire voting system doesn't it? Win some, loose some!

I agree with you about having just the "anglers" only vote! But since almost all of our funds that are used to run or support the fish and wildlife agencies come out of our states "general funds", it would be both fair and appropriate for the "general public" to have a vote on any such issues!


Cowlitzfisherman