Hardly.

Clinton blatantly lied to the world, his wife, family, and litterally got got caught with his pants down in the oval office. JFK seemed to have problems keeping his pants up too, but at least he never actually did it in the white house and didn't stick his mug on TVs accross the world and lie through his teath.

So the big difference is that Clinton personally 'stained' the country's reputation, honor, and respect - and thus he personally took the heat for his actions. Bush was not personally involved, but he is going to personally ensure that those who were are dealt with accordingly. Big difference.