Hmmm, I get mixed signals from this report.

So the US gets attacked the first time at the world trade center, an attack on the Cole, etc - and then a full force attack by airliners on the WTC towers and the Pentagon and (attempted) white house - and we go after OBL in afganistan and wage war on Iraq, and since we've had no more attacks on US soil. Plus:
"However, since the war it said that arms proliferation and state-sponsored terrorism has dwindled, with Libya giving up its unconventional weapons programs and Syria becoming "less provocative." "

So before 9/11, OBL's terror network wasn't full force, and now after the Iraq war, this is evidence that it is?

Further more, the attacks on Madrid, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are the result of "anti-US sentiment" that has spiked because of the Iraq war???

Sounds like they are trying too hard to justify their desire to give into the demands of the terrorists instead of fighting them head on...