The problem with FEMA is that some jacka$$ appointed another jacka$$ to run it. He in turn awarded no bid contracts to fellow jacka$$'s. So we ended up with a whole lot of cronies fattening up at the trough while people were dying. As a taxpayer you should be appalled.

The 80's were worse than the 90's. The 2000's are worse than the 90's. What's your point? You contridict yourself here. According to you there are plenty of jobs, meaning employees have a lot of options, meaning if you are "forced" to cut health care employees can and will readily move on and work for someone who does offer healthcare. Net result in your world is only you, the employer, loses. Right?