Originally Posted By: IrishRogue
ISO,
The difference is that you want to throw hundreds of thousands of dollars at 19 week premature babies who are unlikely to survive, much less lead long healthy lives. The rest of us want to take that same money and save geometrically more lives by providing preventive and regular care for the working poor in our country.
Or is it only the RIGHT THING TO DO if it is for 19 weeks pemature babies?



OK. Then you get the job of telling the Mothers of those babies that you decided they were too expensive and as such had to die.

Fair enough?

MB